Scaling in Quantitative Survey in Management Science Research: The Perspective of Likert Scale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29114/ajtuv.vol8.iss2.321Keywords:
6-point likert scaling,, likert scale, scaling, survey research, management sciencesAbstract
The research process entails the collection of data through questionnaire providing a ranking scale platform for measuring the respondents’ responses. Thus, this paper explores the topic of scaling in quantitative survey research in the field of management science, with a focus on Likert scaling. The paper delves into the types of scaling discussed in the literature, incorporating classical test theory as well as item response theory as guiding frameworks for its objectives. Employing a qualitative research approach, the paper allows for the use of contextual analysis through Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA). Presented is an overview of the various types of Likert scaling including 2-point, 3-point, 4-point, 5- point, 6-point, 7-point, 9-point, and beyond. The paper also argues that the 6-point Likert scale is the most appropriate scaling method for management science research as it divides the neutral option (mid-point) issue into parts of agreement and disagreement. The study recommends that management science researchers should familiarize themselves with the different types of Likert scale in order to determine the most appropriate for their studies. The paper suggests that the 6-point Likert scale is particularly relevant for studies within the management sciences field.
Downloads
References
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
<li>Abdi, H. (2010). Guttman scaling. In N. Salkind (Ed.), <i>Encyclopedia of research design</i>. Sage.</li>
<li>Acharya, B. (2010). Questionnaire design. Central Department of Population Studies.</li>
<li>Alhassan, I., Asiamah, N., Opuni, F. F., & Alhassan, A. (2022). The Likert scale: Exploring the unknowns and their potential to mislead the world. <i>UDS International Journal of Development, 9</i>(2), 867–880. <a href="https://doi.org/10.47740/586.UDSIJD6i" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Andersson, B., & Xin, T. (2018). Large sample confidence intervals for item response theory reliability coefficients. <i>Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78</i>(1), 32–45. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417713570" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Armstrong, R. L. (1987). The midpoint on five-point Likert-type scale. <i>Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64</i>(2), 359–362. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1987.64.2.359" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Benidiktus, T., Rully, C. I. P., & Jeinne, M. (2022). Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties. <i>FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16</i>(4), 89–101. <a href="http://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2022/7" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Bourdel, N., Alves, J., Pickering, G., Ramilo, I., Roman, H., & Canis, M. (2015). Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: How to choose a scale? <i>Human Reproduction Update, 21</i>(1), 136–152.</li>
<li>Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2007). Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths, and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. <i>Journal of the Social Sciences, 3</i>(3), 106–116.</li>
<li>Carlson, M. A., Morris, S., Day, F., Dadich, A., Ryan, A., Fradgley, E. A., & Paul, C. (2021). Psychometric properties of leadership scales for health professionals: A systematic review. <i>Implement Science, 6</i>(1), 85. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01141-z" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Choudhury, S., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2014). Optimal number of scale points in Likert-type scales for quantifying compulsive buying behaviour. <i>Asian Journal of Management Research, 4</i>(3), 432–440.</li>
<li>Chyung, S. Y., Roberts, K., Swanson, I., & Hankinson, A. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. <i>Performance Improvement, 56</i>(10), 15–23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Chyung, S. Y., Swanson, I., Roberts, K., & Hankinson, A. (2018). Evidence‐based survey design: The use of continuous rating scales in surveys. <i>Performance Improvement, 57</i>(5), 38–48. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21763" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Corbetta, P. (2003). <i>Social research: Theory, methods and techniques</i>. Sage.</li>
<li>Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences. <i>Journal of Adult Education, 40</i>(1), 19–22.</li>
<li>Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. <i>Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40</i>(3), 434–449. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Guy, R. F., & Norvell, M. (1977). The neutral point on a Likert scale. <i>The Journal of Psychology, 95</i>(2), 199–204. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1977.9915880" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
<li>Hilbert, S., Küchenhoff, H., Sarubin, N., Nakagawa, T. T., & Bühner, M. (2016). The influence of the response format in a personality questionnaire: An analysis of a dichotomous, a Likert-type, and a visual analogue scale. <i>Testing, Psychometry, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23</i>(1), 3–24. <a href="https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM23.1.1" target="_blank">Crossref</a></li>
</ul>
</body>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
PUBLICATION AGREEMENT
Annual Journal of Technical university of Varna (AJTUV) aims to guarantee that original material is published while at the same time giving significant freedom to our authors. For that matter, we uphold a flexible copyright policy meaning that there is no transfer of copyright to the publisher and authors retain exclusive copyright to their work.
When submitting a manuscript the Corresponding Author is required to accept the terms and conditions set forth in our Publication Agreement as follows:
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR'S GRANT OF RIGHTS
The Corresponding Author grants to AJTUV, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term the following:
• An irrevocable non-exclusive right to publish, reproduce, republish, transmit, distribute and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the publication and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
• An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of the Work, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
• An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, translate, republish, transmit and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed (Currently this is carried out by publishing the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License).
Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors. Authors retain patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR'S DUTIES
When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the AJTUV in which the Work is published as the source of first publication. Corresponding Author warrants that Co-authors will also credit the AJTUV in which the Work is published as the source of first publication when they are distributing or re-publishing the Work.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR'S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes any literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author warrants that the Work is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal or in a book or edited collection, and is not under consideration for any such publication. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement. If the Work was prepared jointly the Corresponding Author warrants that all Co-authors consent to the submission and publication of the Work.
The Corresponding Author agrees to hold AJTUV harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations and warranties.
AJTUV DUTIES AND RIGHTS
AJTUV agrees to publish the Work attributing it to its Authors. AJTUV is granted the authority to enforce the rights from this agreement, on behalf of the authors, against third parties (for example in cases of plagiarism or copyright infringements).
AJTUV's Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in the AJTUV website will be used only and exclusively for the stated purposes of this annual journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
All personal information supplied will remain within publisher and will not be shared with any external entity unless prior permission is given.
Your personal information will not be sold, distributed or published in any manner whatsoever.
